Both backtests used the identical entry and exit triggers on the 2nd method. Except one only took entries that followed chart patterns, ie buying into higher highs and higher lows, and selling into lower lows and lower highs. I found the results were pretty staggering. While the gross income from trades was 200.00 lower following chart patterns, if you figured in the commissions from all the trades taken it actually came out 300.00 more profitable. Essentially the system was able to produce the same amount of profit and it took almost one half the original amount of trades. In other words, following the chart patters eliminated half the trades (half the market risk) and still produced an identical amount of profits.
Not only that, but look at the equity curves below.
No Chart Patterns:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/281c7/281c770e288fce369ffd4e3f6b74a3828f10ff52" alt=""
Chart Patterns:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/391ea/391eaa9378f8c6f7087c5a3b160f7e01aa11a6bd" alt=""
Note that the second image appears to have a smoother trajectory up the graph and the draw downs are much less severe. Thats why we follow the chart patterns!!!
Below is a equity curve over the same time period trading my primary method. Note how smooth the curve is... almost no drawdowns whatsoever. Thats why i'm not trading the 2nd method live yet. I don't know if the equity curve is acceptable where its at or if it needs improvement.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddeb1/ddeb1d7d55fe8459778a6c2b81e242eac442b217" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment